China sourcing tools

Supplier risk & QC planner

Tell us about your order and the gaps you see. Get a practical list of checks to agree before the next payment or shipment.

Your order

Buyer type

Needs supplier evidence, approval notes, audit trail, and payment-gate logic.

Decision stage

The supplier is moving toward mass production, balance payment, or QC release.

Supplier role

The supplier has not proven whether it is factory, trader, or market desk.

Evidence level

Some documents, photos, samples, or quotes exist, but gaps remain.

Destination market

Where do you see risk?

Select the concerns that apply to this order.

What do these risk flags mean?

Supplier identity unclear: Factory, trader, market desk, or distributor role is not proven.
Quote looks too cheap: Price, MOQ, tooling, packaging, payment, or lead time may hide risk.
Spec sheet has gaps: Material, tolerance, finish, function, variants, or compliance are vague.
Sample approval is weak: Sample version, change notes, photos, or buyer sign-off are not controlled.
Packaging or label risk: Artwork, barcode, language, carton marks, or retail pack may block sale.
QC defect concern: Critical, major, or minor defect rules are missing or inspection failed before.
Shipment documents unclear: Packing list, invoice, carton count, weights, or handoff data may mismatch.
Payment before proof: The supplier wants deposit or balance before enough release evidence is visible.
Destination-market risk: The target market may require labels, warnings, documents, or lab tests.

View your plan

Suggested plan

Critical risk

Spec and sample release plan

Do not release production until the spec sheet, sample version, QC standard, and payment gate are tied together.

Based on your selections. Confirm the scope before work begins.

Recommended checks

Spec sheet gap list across material, function, tolerance, packaging, and labels.
Approved-sample version, change notes, and buyer sign-off record.
QC checklist handoff tied to the exact spec and sample evidence.

Start RFQ with spec and sample plan View sample sourcing file Choose service scope

Missing proof to request

Reference photos, drawings, material rules, and allowed substitutions.
Approved sample photos, change log, artwork version, and packaging rules.
Destination-market label, warning, or compliance assumptions.

Details for your quote

Use this lane when the supplier can quote or sample, but the buyer file is not controlled enough for production or balance-payment decisions. It turns ambiguous requirements into inspection-ready evidence.

Product link, photos, drawings, or current specification sheet.
Sample status, required changes, packaging, logo, and target market.
Target quantity, target price, and production timeline.

Selected risk checks

Request role evidence and category-fit notes before deposit.
Turn gaps into supplier questions and inspection checkpoints.
Define AQL, defect levels, rework, reinspection triggers, and balance-payment release rules.
List proof required before deposit, balance-payment gate, or shipment release.

Buyer: Private-label brand

Likely support: Supplier review, Product and sample work, Quality control

View complete plan

Buyer type: Procurement team
Project stage: Production release
Supplier role: Unknown role
Evidence level: Partial evidence
Target market: United States
Risk flags: Supplier identity unclear, Spec sheet has gaps, QC defect concern, Payment before proof
Recommended lane: Spec and sample release plan
Severity: Critical
Decision rule: Do not release production until the spec sheet, sample version, QC standard, and payment gate are tied together.
Included evidence: Spec sheet gap list across material, function, tolerance, packaging, and labels. | Approved-sample version, change notes, and buyer sign-off record. | QC checklist handoff tied to the exact spec and sample evidence.
Missing evidence: Reference photos, drawings, material rules, and allowed substitutions. | Approved sample photos, change log, artwork version, and packaging rules. | Destination-market label, warning, or compliance assumptions.
Next checks: Ask suppliers to quote against one controlled specification sheet. | Convert each must-have spec into a measurable QC checkpoint. | Separate regulated lab testing from Aeonix sourcing/QC coordination.

Supplier risk & QC planner

Explore the checks behind your plan.